TOPCon vs PERC vs HJT Solar Panels: Which Cell Type Makes Sense for a Hot Leyte or Biliran Roof?

TOPCon (N-type) panels lose less power in the heat and degrade more slowly than older PERC (P-type) panels, and HJT goes a little further. In Naval's climate, that heat difference is worth about 1.2% more energy a year for TOPCon and about 1.9% for HJT. We compared three real datasheets, PVGIS weather for Naval, and Philippine seller prices, where TOPCon was not more expensive than PERC.

For a new rooftop system in Leyte or Biliran, an N-type TOPCon panel is the sensible default in 2026. It loses less power when it's hot, its warranty promises more output after 25 years, and in our 30 October check, Philippine sellers weren't charging more for TOPCon than for older PERC panels. HJT (heterojunction) panels handle heat a little better still, but they're hard to find with a peso price here. A good PERC panel at a clearly lower price still works fine; the difference is a few percent, not night and day.

How big is "a few percent"? Using five years of PVGIS weather for Naval, we worked out that the heat penalty costs a typical PERC panel about 7.4% of its energy over a year, TOPCon about 6.3% and HJT about 5.6%. So TOPCon makes roughly 1.2% more energy than the same-watt PERC panel, and HJT about 1.9% more, just from handling heat better.

Last checked 30 October 2026. Panel figures are from the makers' datasheets in the Sources. Peso prices are seller listings checked on 30 October 2026. Heat-loss and warranty numbers are Solar Leyte calculations, with the assumptions stated. Nothing here is a MACC price or a quote.

PERC, TOPCon and HJT in plain words

All three are monocrystalline silicon cells. The difference is in how the cell is built and what the wafer is doped with:

  • PERC (Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell) adds a passivating layer to the back of a cell. It's usually made on a P-type wafer. PERC was the mainstream panel for most of the last decade, and a lot of the "mono PERC 550 W" stock in the Philippines is still this type.
  • TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) puts an ultra-thin oxide layer and doped silicon on the back of an N-type wafer. Jinko's Tiger Neo, Trina's Vertex N and most new "N-type" panels are TOPCon.
  • HJT (heterojunction) sandwiches an N-type wafer between thin layers of amorphous silicon. It's naturally two-sided and has the lowest heat loss of the three, but it needs different factory lines.

The market has already moved. The ITRPV roadmap, written with input from the big manufacturers, expected TOPCon to hold 68% of cell production in 2025 and PERC to fall to 18%. Its 2026 edition says about 82% of wafers made in 2025 were N-type and that PERC "is rapidly phasing out". So if a seller is pushing PERC hard, it's fair to ask whether you're buying older stock, and to ask for a lower price.

The datasheet numbers side by side

We picked one current, real datasheet for each type. These are examples, not recommendations, and other models in the same family differ slightly.

PERC: LONGi Hi-MO 5m LR5-72HPH-550M

TOPCon: Jinko Tiger Neo JKM580N-72HL4-BDV

HJT: HD Hyundai HiT-H710GH

Wafer type

P-type (gallium-doped)

N-type

N-type

Rated power

550 W

580 W

710 W

Module efficiency

21.3%

22.45%

22.86%

Power temperature coefficient

−0.340%/°C

−0.29%/°C

−0.26%/°C

First-year degradation (warranty)

under 2%

1%

1%

Yearly degradation after that

0.55%

0.40%

0.375%

Linear power warranty

25 years, 84.8% at year 25

30 years

30 years, 88% at year 30

Product warranty

12 years

12 years

15 years

Back-side power (bifaciality)

none (single glass, one-sided)

80 ± 5%

85 ± 5%

Size

2,278 × 1,134 mm

2,278 × 1,134 mm

2,384 × 1,303 mm

Figures from each maker's datasheet (see Sources). The HJT panel is a larger 132-cell format, so compare efficiency, not watts.

Three things stand out. The efficiency gap is small: about one percentage point from PERC to TOPCon, and less from TOPCon to this HJT panel. The real differences are the temperature coefficient and the degradation warranty. And the Jinko and LONGi panels are exactly the same size, so on the same roof, the TOPCon panel gives you 30 W more per panel.

Temperature coefficient: why heat matters more in Leyte

Panels are rated at a cell temperature of 25 °C. On a Leyte roof at midday, the cells run far hotter than that, and every degree above 25 °C costs a fixed share of power. That share is the temperature coefficient.

Here's a simple example. PAGASA's 1991–2020 normals put Tacloban's average daily high in May at 32.5 °C. Using the standard NOCT method from PVEducation, with a 45 °C NOCT (the LONGi datasheet's figure, used for all three so only the coefficient changes) and full sun of 1,000 W/m², the cells would sit at about 64 °C. At that temperature:

Cell type (coefficient)

Share of rated power left at a 64 °C cell

550 W-class panel at that moment

PERC (−0.340%/°C)

86.8%

about 477 W from 550 W

TOPCon (−0.29%/°C)

88.8%

about 488 W from 550 W

HJT (−0.26%/°C)

89.9%

about 495 W from 550 W

Worked example, Solar Leyte calculation: cell temperature = 32.5 + (45 − 20) ÷ 800 × 1,000 = 63.75 °C. Panels mounted close to a roof usually run hotter than the open-rack NOCT test assumes.

A hot noon is the worst case, though. For the whole year, we took PVGIS hourly sunshine and air temperature for Naval, Biliran (2019–2023, panels tilted 10° facing south) and applied the same cell-temperature model hour by hour. The energy-weighted average cell temperature came out at about 46.6 °C, and the heat loss over a year was:

Cell type

Energy lost to heat over a year (Naval)

Energy compared with PERC

PERC

7.36%

baseline

TOPCon

6.28%

+1.17%

HJT

5.63%

+1.87%

Solar Leyte calculation from PVGIS-ERA5 hourly data for Naval (11.56° N, 124.40° E) and each datasheet's power temperature coefficient. Heat loss only; other losses (wiring, inverter, dirt) aren't included.

Bar chart of the share of a year's solar energy lost to heat in Naval, Biliran: PERC (LONGi Hi-MO 5m) about 7.36 percent, TOPCon (Jinko Tiger Neo) about 6.28 percent and HJT (HD Hyundai HiT) about 5.63 percent. TOPCon gives about 1.17 percent more energy than PERC, HJT about 1.87 percent more.
Source: Solar Leyte calculation from PVGIS-ERA5 hourly data for Naval, Biliran (2019–2023, 10° tilt facing south) and each maker's datasheet temperature coefficient. Estimate only. Checked 30 October 2026.

What that means on a real roof, as an example: PVGIS estimates a 5 kW system in Naval (10° tilt, facing south, 14% system losses) makes about 7,435 kWh a year. 1.17% extra is about 87 kWh a year from TOPCon. At an example rate of ₱12 per kWh (use the rate on your own bill), that's about ₱1,000 a year. It's real, but small. It shouldn't outweigh a big price gap or a weak warranty.

Degradation: what the warranty promises after 25 years

All panels lose a little output every year. The linear power warranty is the maker's promise of how much output will be left at minimum. These are floors, not forecasts, but they show the gap well.

Year

PERC (LONGi Hi-MO 5m)

TOPCon (Jinko Tiger Neo)

HJT (HD Hyundai)

1

98.0%

99.0%

99.0%

10

93.05%

95.4%

95.6%

25

84.8%

89.4%

90.0%

30

no cover (25-year warranty)

87.4%

88.1%

Year 1 and the end points are from the datasheets. The middle years are Solar Leyte calculations: first-year figure minus the yearly rate for each later year.

Line chart of the warranted minimum power by year. PERC (LONGi Hi-MO 5m) starts at 98 percent after year 1 and falls 0.55 points a year to 84.8 percent at year 25. TOPCon (Jinko Tiger Neo) starts at 99 percent and falls 0.40 a year to 87.4 percent at year 30. HJT (HD Hyundai HiT) starts at 99 percent and falls 0.375 a year to about 88 percent at year 30.
Source: LONGi Hi-MO 5m, Jinko Tiger Neo 72HL4-BDV and HD Hyundai HiT-H700–720GH datasheets and Jinko's limited warranty; straight lines drawn by Solar Leyte. These are warranty floors, not predicted output. Checked 30 October 2026.

By year 25, the TOPCon warranty guarantees about 4.6 percentage points more of the original power than the PERC one, and it runs five years longer. On a 5 kW system, that's roughly 230 W of extra guaranteed capacity at year 25 (our calculation). For more on how these warranties are worded and claimed, see our solar panel lifespan and warranty guide.

LID and LeTID, briefly

Some of PERC's early loss comes from light-induced degradation (LID). NREL researchers describe it as mostly caused by boron-oxygen defects in boron-doped P-type wafers, with reported efficiency losses of 0.5% to 1.5% absolute in cells. Makers have worked around this: LONGi's Hi-MO 5m uses a gallium-doped wafer. N-type panels avoid the boron-oxygen problem: Jinko says its TOPCon panels have lower LID and LeTID (a heat-related cousin), and HD Hyundai says its N-type HJT wafer eliminates LID. Those are maker claims, and they show up in the smaller first-year numbers in the warranties.

Half-cut cells: what "half-cell" on a listing means

"Half-cell" or "half-cut" isn't a cell type. It's how the cells are cut and wired, and PERC, TOPCon and HJT panels all use it (every panel in the table above does). Each cell is cut in two, so each half carries half the current.

According to Fraunhofer CSP researchers writing in Photovoltaics International, resistive losses in the cell connections rise with the square of the current. Halving the current cuts those losses to a quarter: from up to about 3% of module power down to about 0.75%. Cutting the cells costs about 0.5% (relative) at the cell edge, but the module still comes out ahead. Half-cell modules are also more tolerant of partial shading, such as dust in a corner. In short, half-cut is a good thing, but it's normal now, not a premium feature.

Prices in the Philippines (30 October 2026)

Panel (as listed)

Cell type (as listed)

Seller

Listed price

₱ per watt (our calculation)

Sunova 550 W mono PERC

PERC

Phsolar

₱6,700

₱12.18

AE 550 W mono PERC

PERC

Phsolar

₱7,000

₱12.73

Seraphim 620 W TOPCon bifacial

TOPCon

Helios Optimum Development

₱5,000

₱8.06

Trina Solar 600 W Vertex N-Type bifacial

N-type (as listed)

Helios Optimum Development

₱5,000

₱8.33

Seller listings checked 30 October 2026, before delivery. Listing a product isn't an endorsement, and Solar Leyte earns nothing from these links.

The two TOPCon listings were cheaper per watt than the two PERC ones. That's four listings from two sellers, so it isn't a market survey. But it matches what we saw in our 550 W to 620 W panel price check: the seller and the freight matter more than the cell type. We didn't find an HJT panel with a peso price on a Philippine seller site in this check. If an installer offers HJT, ask for the exact model, datasheet and warranty PDF, and compare it on ₱ per watt delivered to Naval, Ormoc or Tacloban.

Which one should you buy?

  • New rooftop system: TOPCon is the safe default. Same size and price range as PERC here, less heat loss, a longer power warranty. Check that the panel's current suits your inverter.
  • Tight roof, hot GI sheet, or you want the most kWh per square metre: HJT is worth asking about, if you can get a real quote and local warranty support.
  • PERC at a clear discount: fine for a budget system, a small off-grid setup or matching existing panels. Make sure it's a known maker with a datasheet, and price it below TOPCon.
  • Adding panels to an old system: match the existing panels' electrical specs first. Cell type matters less than voltage and current.

Bisaya/Tagalog quick take: Kung bag-o ang imong sistema, TOPCon na lang. Gamay ra ang kalainan sa presyo, pero mas lig-on sa init ug mas taas ang warranty. (Kung bago ang system mo, TOPCon na. Halos pareho ang presyo, mas kaya ang init at mas mahaba ang warranty.)

Before you pay, ask for the exact model code, the datasheet and the maker's warranty PDF. Our guide to what "Tier 1" really means and our Jinko vs Trina vs LONGi comparison cover the brand side. If you're buying online, read our Lazada and Shopee checklist.

FAQ

Is TOPCon better than PERC?

On paper, yes. In the datasheets we compared, TOPCon lost less power per degree (−0.29% vs −0.34%/°C), degraded more slowly (0.40% vs 0.55% a year) and had a 30-year power warranty instead of 25. In Naval's climate, that heat difference alone is worth about 1.2% more energy a year (our calculation).

Is N-type the same as TOPCon?

Not exactly. N-type describes the wafer. TOPCon and HJT are both N-type cell designs. Most "N-type" panels sold in the Philippines in 2026 are TOPCon, but ask for the datasheet to be sure.

Are HJT panels worth it in the Philippines?

They have the lowest heat loss (about 1.9% more yearly energy than PERC in our Naval calculation) and long warranties. The catch is availability and price: we found no HJT peso listing on Philippine seller sites on 30 October 2026, so get a written quote and check local warranty support.

What does "half-cut" or "half-cell" mean?

Each cell is cut in two, which halves the current and cuts connection losses to about a quarter. It's a standard feature on PERC, TOPCon and HJT panels, not a separate cell type.

Related guides

Solar Leyte is run by MACC Systems & Energy Solutions Inc., a solar installer in Naval, Biliran.

Get a free solar quote from MACC

Comparing panel quotes? Send us the panel model codes (or photos of the labels) plus a recent BILECO or LEYECO bill. We'll check them and suggest a system, with no obligation.

Sources (all checked 30 October 2026)

Free quote · Leyte & Biliran

Thinking about solar? Get a free quote from MACC.

Send us your monthly kWh use (it's on your BILECO or LEYECO bill) and what you want solar to do: lower your bill, keep the lights on in a brownout, or both. MACC Systems & Energy Solutions Inc. will reply with an itemised quotation.